DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JRE
Docket No. 600-13
9 Jenuery 2014
Dear &
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
sitting in executive session, considered your
fon on 9 January 2014. Your allegations of error and
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceed
his Board. Documentary material considered b
consisted of your application, together with @ x
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and POLICIES.
Bfter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You entered on active duty in the Navy Reserve on 19 January
1968, at which time you disclosed that you had sustained two
Significant knee injuries prior to enlisting. On 17 July 1968
a medical board determined that you were disabled by internal
derangement of your left knee which existed prio to your
enlistment and was not incurred in or aggravated by your active
service in the Navy Reserve. Yu apparently concurred with that
determination, as you waived your right to appear before a
physical evaluation board, and requested that you be
administratively discharged as soon as possible without
compensation for your knee condition. Your request was granted,
and you were discharged on 31 July 1968 without entitlement to
disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy.
In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your
disability was incurred in or aggravated by your naval service,
the Board was unable to recommend favorable action on your
request. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the panel members will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. Youare entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. Inthis regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ~ ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11013-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2008. The Board concluded that the available records are insufficient to demonstrate that you were unfit for duty on 18 September 1968 due to a mental disorder was incurred in or aggravated by your service on active duty for training in the Navy Reserve. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00747-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08289-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5~QQJREDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06051-08
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11616-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You enlisted in the Navy on 27 July 1981.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08289-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08398-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07762-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2011. You accepted those findings on 10 January 1989, and were honorably discharged from the Marine Corps on 17 February 1989 Following your discharge, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded you a 10% rating for the flat feet condition, and denied your request for service connection fora bilateral knee condition. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04334-01
Documentary material considered by the Board your After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) made preliminary findings that you were unfit for duty because of post traumatic stress disorder and major depression, which existed prior to your enlistment, and were not aggravated by your service. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11157-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You appeared before a medical board on 16 October 1968 and were given a diagnosis of bilateral flatfoot, symptomatic, existed prior to enlistment, not...